When 27,000 Stores Become 19,000

They had more stores than McDonald's and Starbucks combined. Then came the collapse
When 27,000 Stores Become 19,000
Table of Contents
In: Market Share
Wash Weekly is brought to you by: LAUNDRY CEO FORUM

Where Laundry Owners Build Thier Businesses & Network

Join the exclusive circle of laundry industry owners/operators driving real results in their businesses.

"A unique event focused on the strategy and leadership tools that growth-oriented laundry owners need."
— Brian R. Store Owner/Operator

Reserve Your Seat

There are an estimated 29,500 laundromats in the United States.

That's more locations than Subway had at its absolute peak.

Subway, the chain that was on fire at one point. It was on every corner, it became the largest restaurant chain in America by location count at 27,100 stores in 2015.

Today? They are down to 19,502 locations.

In less than 10 years, they've closed 7,600 stores. That's not a restructuring or a minor adjustment. That's closing the equivalent of Taco Bell's entire U.S. chain.

And here's what got me thinking. If an industry with 27,000 locations can lose 28% of its stores while most people still think of it as successful, what does that mean for an industry with 29,500 locations?

The Rise and Fall Nobody Talks About

Remember when Subway was everywhere? At their peak in 2015, they had 27,000 U.S. locations¹, more than McDonald's and Starbucks combined. They were the success story everyone wanted to be like or part of. Low franchise fees ($116,000 versus millions for McDonald's)², easy entry, rapid expansion.

Today? Subway has shrunk to 20,100 locations³. They've closed 7,600 stores, that's more than Burger King's entire U.S. chain⁴.

But here's the part that should make every laundromat owner pause: it's not just about store count.

The Numbers Tell a Story

Franchise U.S. Locations Revenue per Unit Reality Check
Subway 20,100 $420-490k Most locations, lowest revenue
McDonald's 13,800 $2.7 million⁶ Fewer stores, 5.5x the revenue
Starbucks 17,900 $1.5 million⁷ Similar footprint, 3x revenue
Chick-fil-A 2,552 $6 million⁸ 1/8 the stores, 12x the revenue
Taco Bell 7,400 $1.5 million⁹ 1/3 the stores, 3x revenue
Burger King 6,700 $1.3 million¹⁰ 1/3 the stores, 2.6x revenue
Domino's 6,800 $800k-1M¹¹ Even pizza delivery beats Subway

Look at those numbers again. Subway has the most locations but generates the least revenue per store. Meanwhile, Chick-fil-A has fewer locations than Subway closed, yet each store generates $6 million.

The Pattern We're Seeing

Subway's playbook was simple, make it easy to get in, grow fast, worry about sustainability later. No protected territories meant multiple franchises could open near each other. The result? Cannibalization. Franchisees competed against each other, not just other brands. Meanwhile, Jersey Mike's - with just 2,997 locations, generates $1.3 million per store, nearly triple Subway's revenue.

Sound familiar?

The laundromat industry has 29,500 locations¹², more than Subway at its peak. In NYC, I regularly see laundromats directly across the street from each other or a short walk from each other.

When revenue disappoints, what happens? Owners add complexity to compensate. Subway added breakfast, salads, pizzas. Laundromats add wash-and-fold, pickup and delivery, dry cleaning. But here's what Subway learned, adding services to a weak foundation doesn't fix the foundation.

The Chick-fil-A Counter-Lesson

While Subway was racing to 27,000 locations, Chick-fil-A took the opposite approach. They're super selective. Harder to get a franchise than to get into Harvard¹³. Each location is carefully vetted for market viability. They have just 2,552 locations, but each one thrives.

The question isn't whether we can open more laundromats. It's whether we should.

What This Means For Our Industry

I'm not saying laundromats are doomed, far from it. People will always need clean clothes, until clothes don’t need cleaning anymore 🤔. But I am seeing patterns:

  • Markets have capacity limits. When you exceed them, everyone struggles.
  • The "easy entry" narrative attracts too many players, creating over saturation.
  • Low revenue per location leads to deferred maintenance, poor service, and zombie businesses.
  • Adding complexity (more services) without fixing core economics just increases problems.
Thinking about the thinking of laundry:
When you realize success isn't about being everywhere, it's about being excellent wherever you are.

The Question Worth Asking

If your market has four laundromats, each making $300k, would it be better to have two making $600k? Is that consolidation or sustainability?

Subway is learning this lesson after losing 7,600 stores. The question is, will we learn from their example, or repeat it?

That's all I got for you today.

Waleed

PS: Have you gotten your ticket yet? Laundry CEO Forum


Echoing the thoughts of Bill Gates.

Success is a lousy teacher. It seduces smart people into thinking they can't lose.

Footnotes:

¹ Subway Peak Locations - QSR Magazine, 2015
² Subway Franchise Costs - Vetted Biz, 2024
³ Current Subway Locations - QSR Magazine, 2025
Subway Store Closures - Restaurant Business, 2025
Subway Revenue per Unit - Restaurant Business, 2024
McDonald's AUV - QSR Magazine, 2025
Starbucks Revenue per Store - Statista, 2024
Chick-fil-A Store Performance - QSR Magazine, 2025
Taco Bell Performance Metrics - Food Industry, 2024
¹⁰ Burger King Revenue Data - NRN, 2025
¹¹ Domino's Store Economics - Food Industry, 2024
¹² U.S. Laundromat Count - CLA, 2024
¹³ Chick-fil-A Franchise Selectivity - Business Insider, 2024

Comments
More from Wash Weekly
Great! You’ve successfully signed up.
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
You've successfully subscribed to Wash Weekly.
Your link has expired.
Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.
Success! Your billing info has been updated.
Your billing was not updated.